Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ruby Amanfu's avatar

Daughter in law here. Guess how much I love this article on a scale of 1 to 100…:)

Job well doing, Dad. Words that must be spoken. Let all who have ears to hear do so.

Steven Danver's avatar

Charlie, as usual, you capture something many of us are feeling: the jarring collision between ordinary, good life and the possibility of extraordinary harm unfolding at the same time.

I want to say clearly that my solidarity is with the innocent people in Iran who have no control over their government and yet bear the terror of war. It is both true that Iran’s regime is repressive and dangerous, and equally true that the Iranian people are not that regime. They are families, students, artists, children. Human beings whose lives carry the same weight as our own.

From both a Christian and a humanist perspective, it is very difficult to justify a war initiated without clear provocation, without broad democratic consent, and with predictable harm to civilians. The teachings of Christ point toward humility and care for the vulnerable. Humanist ethics center dignity and the reduction of suffering. On either foundation, this does not resolve into something virtuous. Rather, it raises serious moral concern.

And we should be honest about responsibility. This war did not simply “happen”...it was deliberately initiated by the President (and his bloodthirsty "Secretary of War") and by the Israeli Prime Minister. It reflects decisions made at the highest level, and those decisions have drastic ramifications. When a president acts unilaterally (domestically), without the grounding of Congress or the consent of the governed, and does so in a way that appears driven by impulse, grievance, or personal calculus, we have a problem that goes beyond policy. We have a crisis of leadership. We cannot allow the fate of millions, at home or abroad, to be shaped by the whims of a transactional, narcissistic "leader" who treats institutions, alliances, and human lives as instruments rather than responsibilities.

Your larger point about ethos resonates deeply with me in this moment. On a personal level, we are gathered around tables, eating ice cream, living life with loving family and friends, trying to do some good in the world. On a societal level, we are part of a nation capable of decisions that contradict those very values. That tension between who we are in our daily lives and what is done in our name is not easy to hold, but it is real.

At the college at which I work and in the classes I teach, I see students wrestling with exactly this kind of contradiction. They are trying to figure out what it means to live ethically in a world where good and troubling forces are always intertwined. Moments like this become part of that formation.

So yes, pray, reflect, act where we can. But we also have to speak plainly, as you've done here. There is evil in the world, including in regimes like Iran’s and here in the United States as well. And there are also choices—our choices—that lead to harm to innocents and cannot be reconciled with the values we claim to hold. Holding both truths at once is uncomfortable, but it’s necessary if we’re going to navigate this moment with any integrity.

126 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?